Fact Theory - Part I ( Yes, there will be Part II)

Fact Theory:

In the thriving norms of our coherent human civilization, everything is taken under the liability of subjective and objective claims and postulates. What’s being missed out is a lot more than just those 2 sides of a coin. An exploration into things such as the existentially of an observation is basic, but relative, or subject to the observer at the time or point of observation. Outside of its boundaries, the only things that remain true are the recordings of that observation. But, in any case, the observation was from one subject, and the claim regarding it remains in subject to the thoughts, motive and mindset of the observer at the time of observation. 

I decided to start reading Eckhart Tolle's book called "A New Earth Awakening", and by all means, I'm again reminded of everything that I've delved into so far. I'll admit that I try to find more of Krishnamurti ' s perspective within all things , but then again I consider everyone else's side as well without bias.

When they go back to the whole idea of not seeking anyone else's way , it just becomes a paradox as much as to our oblivious mind. An awakening doesn't come simply , it's a long process. A process that'll unwrap the mind from norms, limitations, archaic values and traditions. Some think that's really wrong and some think that's the right way. I, of course , have no control over anyone else's thoughts , ideas, mindsets or ideologies. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and that element is being slowly integrated into our society, but not so as much. It's still in a gradual process.In all seriousness , the process of going through an awakening and enabling a completely open mind can be quite complex. It can be just as hard as trying to re-learn how to walk again after one has come out of their recovery from a terrible road accident. It's mostly because the mental cognition can be quite hard to deal with when it comes in contact with alien like thoughts, or ideas. It's like trying to rewire all the nerves and their functionality. As per described by most philosophers with associations to Eastern Philosophy , stillness and silence has always been the best practice of open-mindedness. It just brings you back in place with non-existentiality and existentiality all in the same room at once- as one might profess.

The purpose is detached, the thoughts become silent waves and the meaning is nowhere. But, for once you are no longer conformed to anything at all- maybe, ironically, your consciousness. Why's it peace , though ?

It's not peace , it's just a feeling of now and eternal which is described as 'peaceful'. It's neither peaceful nor hellish. It's just nothing at all.

Opposing ideas will always come into action, of course. Mindfulness, and mindlessness. There have been cases where meditation had been deemed useless because it doesn't let you dig up on an ideology or rationalize a scenario. 

Again, whatever one does or thinks, it's just a postulate based scenario based on a being ' s observation and subjective reasoning. The whole process requires so and so , and therefore , it can continue without hindrance , unless implied to do so under condition by another being due to their attitude or mindset. One doesn't have to necessarily have to follow a pattern unless they feel satisfied by the pattern itself. Diverging may have a differing , yet equivalent result at the deeper level.

What could make it false, though ? 

Many things, in fact, there’d be ways to rationalize things based on ideological norms or perceptions of it. One could use a video camera or sound recorder to record the observation or scenario to further enhance the evidence(s) of the observation. But, is there any flaw in any of this ? There could be, but it’s not within norms , or typically accepted ideologies and methodologies. For one, the observation was made based on the perception of a human, and the recording was done as per the preceding as well. When seen or heard from a video, or sound recording , respectively, the results are still seen and heard based on the senses of a human’s perception. The question goes from ‘Why does this occur?’ To ‘Why does my mind think that it occurs this way, and not any other way? What’s the chance that my mind could be just seeing a tiny bit of what’s there?’ all the way to ‘Is this really occurring, or is this what our human minds have created as a reflection of how reality occurs?’. The questions never stop extending, it can keep going on forever and ever. However, that’s not how ‘facts’ are treated, but that’s the way it should be. Also, what most people don’t realize is that observations and recordings of observations are mostly based on emotional and subjective claims- despite the claim that ‘logic’ doesn’t come with emotions. As long as one’s a human being, it comes packaged with emotions of some form or sort. 

This is not to bash anyone else, but this is a fundamental element that must and should be addressed in any sort of scenario: the way most academic person would treat something like ‘facts’, ‘logic’ or ‘science’ can be very controversial and sometimes, it’s noticeable that they’re more concerned over political and societal norms and influences rather than exploring something without hindrances. To be more so clear, people who deeply study any sort of topic, whether it’d be ‘science’, ‘mathematics’, ‘history’, ‘English’ or ‘philosophy’ will always have concern more over their attitudes of a certain subject rather than to approach it with an open mind- some are an exception, but it’s a rarity. The conditions for an open mind are very clear, but not so easy as per the typical or archetypal human being. It may sound to the Western man like some inane sort of philosophy, but to the Eastern person, a form of peace from all sorts of worldly affairs. Stillness, meditation, non-conformity: they are what makes up the foundation of an open-minded being. Having any form of disruptive or scorny attitude otherwise eliminates ‘open-mindedness’ and that could potentially go for this statement as well- ironically. This might trigger a lot of modern day scholars, but I have my own say in any case, unless of course someone tries to take unfair actions against such a case- which would be totally inane and illogical: Religion is the base level of ignorance, it condones to nonsensical progression of closed-mindedness. Science on the other hand is but its cousin, and the condition for that is only if the scientists weren’t as ignorant. 

My First Book

Today's post is going to be unlike most of the my other posts, but summed up in a nutshell.
What do I mean by that ?

It's just a bunch of jumbles jiggling all the way in the form of water right in the jug.
Anyways, figurative languages aside, I've published my very first book on Amazon.

It might not be the best thing out there, but if you do feel as if you need some resonance with a bunch of encoded words that describe the depth of your inner meaning, or just want to look at someone else's deep contemplations, then you've probably come to the right place.

Ladies and Gentlemen- & Of course , energies around the universe.

I present to you,

My first ever book, and I've decided to call it :

Epistemological Mysticism

It's going to run as a series of books which will contain poetry and sometimes, some brief contemplations of mine. 

The link to product will be entailed onto the cover of the book below. 

Be sure to leave your thoughts, impressions and opinions on the comment section below. 

P.S. You've all my gratitude for making this possible, and of course the age itself :P. None of this would have come to existence without the experiences that have passed by. 

A Journey For Aeons

Start here, start there,
Welcome to the plain of existence,
Welcome to what we call the 'real world',
This real world,
a world of shatters and scammers,
scammers full of thoughts,
shatters full of blocks,
none of this is brought,
without the catalyst of the dawdling bird,
can this be another jack out of jill ?
or will this be just another hill of still ?
wow indeed.

stillness, that day on the hill,
we brought a will,
the will to not kill,
but to frail and jill,
jill my jill,
in a thrill,
you were bill of the nile,
a nile it sought,
within the vastness of thought,

this thought so vast,
why is it so ?
can't it be home,
on my own dome?
but it's all just lost,
within the bubbles,
representing you and I,
why is it lost ?
not to be thought.

this may be so it on the parallel,
But nothing comes out after this point of Tree   

A View Of Judgement, Identity & Ideology

In our normal day lives, we're obviously bound by cultural or traditional barriers of some sort. It may not be too much, and sometimes way too much. But, the question that should arise in one's mind is that:

"Where did this culture or ideology originate from ? What's its point of origin? "

That's blatantly not a question that one can easily answer without considering the values and peaks of all traditions , histories and cultural evolution.

Now, if one does do that, what can it benefit in the finding of the truth of reality ? 

The answer can possibly be next to nothing, or just a superfluous conclusion. 

What one doesn't really come in terms with in their daily lives is that most of all studies or knowledge will often and always be based on observational conclusions, and not really absolutions- despite claiming to be absolute.

But, what's really the issue with these traditions? 

Well, here's the answer to that: 

Practically, it refrains ourselves of our capacity to think independently, and what’s even worse is that it just mocks us of our independent and anomalous divinity: It leaves almost no room for the sufficient amount of change that we really need contrary to how essentially determined it should be.

Tradition is the one of the pillars of the foundation of a functioning human society, or any society in general.

However, why is it a recurring phenomena?

It's really because the mind seeks for some sort of response from its environment that it interacts and develops in. It's what keeps the brain chemistry of the individuals more so interactive, but it's not like the being necessarily has to, but eventually needs to.

If that's the case, then why resort to conflict ? 

It seems again and again, that many beings in general will want to gather as much attention to their ends as possible, therefore, the lesser attention they get , the more they get tempted to bring about something that'll attract the crowd that they're trying to persuade. 
It's more about to who gets more of the crowd, and attention and thus the persuasion and acts are variably based on schemes that'll either destroy or benefit. Thus, comes the birth of chaos and order, or yin & yang, according to some folks.

Max Planck once said:

So at the end of it all, it really comes down to competition and whoever has the better method of persuasion. So, you're not really working for your own cause, but just for the sake of trying to get out something to the someone else's mind, and thus evolve that into the next and so forth.
Despite the fact that he is talking in context to science, it should be noted that 'science' or 'Natural Philosophy' is only one sub-branch of a whole foundation of ideologies , branches & sub-branches. Therefore, it can be applied to anything in general.

As ideologies pass by, it gets picked up by specific minds with specific areas of interest most relatable to it, and that's where identity comes in. When we develop an ideology, we have to associate a language with it, and that's where identity and label plays a huge deal as without it we don't have a physical way of communicating it through each other- let's say for se at this point, since we haven't evolved at a point where we've been able to detect or observe within our own eyes any form of communication pattern that concerns the non-physical , and that's for the sake of the scientific community, but otherwise we have done so if  we take a look at intuition and its relationship with its surrounding occurrences.  But after we put it into the form of labels and identity, that's when we can uncover more of what we know through each other, but of course as imperfect as our minds are, not everything is within the best intention or chemistry. It doesn't take long for our minds to change its pattern of intentions, desires , wants , or thoughts in general.


Like said above, the conflicting events will always be there as it always comes down to who can get more of the attention; getting the crowd to accept their idea, or work through their own methods of persuasion. Even if it means death, conditioning, benefits to one side and losses to other side, and extinction or destruction.

That's the power of an incumbently evolving pattern of thought or ideology.