Dreamt Light

If ever it were a dream, 

I’d relive it not, 

As the point of having one is to not relive it, 

Will I be here?
Will I be you ?
Will I be me? 

Or will you be me? 

Why not be all at once? 

After all, it’s you and I ,

You and I,

You and I that made up this universe. 

I saw stars glimmer as brightly as the crown, 

I was quite near the end of its edge, 

If you asked whether it burnt me or not,

You’d not get an answer,

As It’s not the sort of question that needs to be answered,

The edge of the star was just meant to be seen,

All that glimmers within is not to be seen,

But to be felt & only felt. 

I ask again in a different correlative question:

Do you think it’s a dream ? 

Even if it is,

It doesn’t matter, 

Nor did it ever. 

If we all share the same energy within,

Then there’s no burning sensation meant to be felt,

So keep dreaming this everlasting effulgent dream. 

-Othello D. Gomes

The Nature

When I refer to nature, I don't simply refer to nature as a whole, but from a perceptive point of view, as the only nature we're most aware, and conscious of is most probably "The Human Nature", as blatant as it sounds,  it's quite true, since everything we've perceived, demonstrated , studied, invented, and imagined are all from the perspective of a human being, as we're all blatantly 'humans'. 

I know everyone has at one point wondered what the 'true' , or rational nature of reality, or the universe is, besides the system we've created to understand the elements, and fundamentals of it. It's a very thought provoking topic, which can't be simplified easily, as the root of it is simply found in the void, or in infinity - when it comes to infinity , it simply defies everything there is to all we know about the whole universe's nature. What we have come to comprehend as the nature of the universe, may essentially not be the nature of what everything, but only towards who 'we' really are, because everything we view , or comprehend comes from the individual perspective of a human being. There might not ever be any absolute truth to anything out there, no matter who, or how anyone tries to present the agenda for what they believe, and how they preach it, for it'd only show the reflection who they are, and how they function, and how they think. It's getting quite complex, right? Well, no, it's not. How one thinks shouldn't be confused with what one thinks, because no matter what the perception is of an individual remains untouched within the frequent presence of the observation. Everything is untouched, nothing is tampered with, all is just observation. It's just you, and yourself, and your eyes' reflection of reality, not the reality itself that you're actually experiencing. All you are , is just a vessel for the state of what we call "living", "experiencing" , or "feeling", nothing outside of what you believe inside this state, is close to what you think of yourself. The reason why I say this , has already been stated a few sentences back: "WE'RE JUST A FREQUENT PRESENCE OF WHAT WE CALL THE EXPERIENCE OF EVERY REFLECTION PRESENTED BY OUR OWN MIND."

While, this is quite sophisticated, it still stands strong at what it aims to convey in a certain sense of the individual. If indeed , nature is meant to have a balance between bad, and good, and have what Darwin describes as "survival of the fittest", then it goes against a lot of physical properties, when it comes to bonding, separating, and reacting to one another in the surrounding. We have discovered so much in our own sense, yet we have learn almost close to nothing in our whole lifetime as a civilization, therefore, we can't ever come to the inference that there indeed is a true "nature", much like if there was ever an "absolute truth". 

Can Utopia Be Easily Achieved?

Not too long back I made a video about whether Utopia is what we think it is, and it still strikes my mind with that certain term Of "A Perfect Place".

Ironically , the term's justifiable means are contrary to what we describe it to be.

CAN THERE BE A PERFECT PLACE? 

Is the term "perfect" deceiving your own mind, or is it a perceived view of what something should be, and fit our own agenda ? Because, when we talk about "perfection" , it's mostly that we're not satisfied with it. 

Besides that, it all comes back to what we perceive , and what we think of. No one can establish a 'Perfect Utopia' ; only a Neigh-Utopia can be established, and that's if you look at how people function in this world. Almost everyone thinks their belief is right, and whatever doesn't fit their agenda is deemed 'ridiculous' , 'crazy' , or , 'retarded'. Rationality must come into place when it comes to that; people still abuse 'Rationality', though, thus making everything irrational.
If one thinks their Utopia is the one , and only, it's still not, because that's only a perception, and opinion of that person, and may still have flaws - almost bound to have flaws.

We don't live in a Utopia, but we can make it way way better, only believe me on that. We don't have to achieve a Utopia, we only have to progress, and make everything better, but to do that we must of course abstain from several things first: Violence, A Destructive Ego, and all that's mentioned in the 7 sins. With those gradually refrained from being in use, we could at last spread Infinite Love, just keep radiating that no matter what comes on your path; once you give up on 'Love' , it'll eventually turn you back into the precise opposite, and fill you with the usual negativity, and hate.
To stop all the hate, and violence, we must spread Infinite unconditional love, instead of trying to form a rebellion, and taking over the Castle , and slaying the Kings, and Queens - as that itself is the continuity of violence itself. Sure, the money system is corrupt too, but it'll disappear once the conscious revolution ends.

-CONCLUSION- 

-AVE UNIVERSUM-