"Where did this culture or ideology originate from ? What's its point of origin? "
That's blatantly not a question that one can easily answer without considering the values and peaks of all traditions , histories and cultural evolution.
Now, if one does do that, what can it benefit in the finding of the truth of reality ?
The answer can possibly be next to nothing, or just a superfluous conclusion.
What one doesn't really come in terms with in their daily lives is that most of all studies or knowledge will often and always be based on observational conclusions, and not really absolutions- despite claiming to be absolute.
But, what's really the issue with these traditions?
Well, here's the answer to that:
Practically, it refrains ourselves of our capacity to think independently, and what’s even worse is that it just mocks us of our independent and anomalous divinity: It leaves almost no room for the sufficient amount of change that we really need contrary to how essentially determined it should be.
Tradition is the one of the pillars of the foundation of a functioning human society, or any society in general.
However, why is it a recurring phenomena?
It's really because the mind seeks for some sort of response from its environment that it interacts and develops in. It's what keeps the brain chemistry of the individuals more so interactive, but it's not like the being necessarily has to, but eventually needs to.
If that's the case, then why resort to conflict ?
It seems again and again, that many beings in general will want to gather as much attention to their ends as possible, therefore, the lesser attention they get , the more they get tempted to bring about something that'll attract the crowd that they're trying to persuade.
It's more about to who gets more of the crowd, and attention and thus the persuasion and acts are variably based on schemes that'll either destroy or benefit. Thus, comes the birth of chaos and order, or yin & yang, according to some folks.
Max Planck once said:
So at the end of it all, it really comes down to competition and whoever has the better method of persuasion. So, you're not really working for your own cause, but just for the sake of trying to get out something to the someone else's mind, and thus evolve that into the next and so forth.
Despite the fact that he is talking in context to science, it should be noted that 'science' or 'Natural Philosophy' is only one sub-branch of a whole foundation of ideologies , branches & sub-branches. Therefore, it can be applied to anything in general.
As ideologies pass by, it gets picked up by specific minds with specific areas of interest most relatable to it, and that's where identity comes in. When we develop an ideology, we have to associate a language with it, and that's where identity and label plays a huge deal as without it we don't have a physical way of communicating it through each other- let's say for se at this point, since we haven't evolved at a point where we've been able to detect or observe within our own eyes any form of communication pattern that concerns the non-physical , and that's for the sake of the scientific community, but otherwise we have done so if we take a look at intuition and its relationship with its surrounding occurrences. But after we put it into the form of labels and identity, that's when we can uncover more of what we know through each other, but of course as imperfect as our minds are, not everything is within the best intention or chemistry. It doesn't take long for our minds to change its pattern of intentions, desires , wants , or thoughts in general.
Like said above, the conflicting events will always be there as it always comes down to who can get more of the attention; getting the crowd to accept their idea, or work through their own methods of persuasion. Even if it means death, conditioning, benefits to one side and losses to other side, and extinction or destruction.
That's the power of an incumbently evolving pattern of thought or ideology.
No comments:
Post a Comment