The Chaos & Order Of Romance & Love

I believe that I may be one of many rare cases who’ll never truly come to comprehend what romance is and nor do I feel the necessity to enhance any growth towards this. I highly believe that I was born with the inability to not feel the true value of this ‘beauty’ which people call it so and so. Afore my primordial instinct being still sprung towards action back and forth, my inner senses have it under control. It’s mere alchemy of my conscious and unconscious parables that control, regulate, and flow this state of mind from its microcosmic brethren. For the longest, I’ve suffered from this frequent interaction, but it becomes clearer day by day that it is indeed my own illusion that has produced this new reality of mazes and labyrinths governed by strings of ethereal and stagnant relations.

During my recent study of spirituality and philosophy, I came under lots of incidences where renowned philosophers and polymaths suffered from almost the same disease that I’m currently suffering from. Some had actual celibacy, while others were naturally tainted by its pre-determined presence- in other words, asexuality. They may have considered themselves to be not efficacious at all, but I wouldn’t go as far as to conclude that- not that I consider myself to be efficacious nor will I ever be able to accomplish such a feat. Their minds and consciousness were constantly governed by strings of curiosity and ponder; thus, the nihilistic appearance of an inseparable deity had scrutinized their dreams and invaded their gardens of Eden. It’s not my implication that they were exploited by a radical, or normalized belief system, or fundamental value, but their synonymous appearances may have had a huge worldwide phenomenon in the coming of the eradication of an illusory subconsciousness. That’s of course, not to abandon the value of what already remained of religious values, but it already had inspired an ideology, which remained absent of the idea of a literary form of love- again, it’s not to imply that platonic love hasn’t existed before, but in the modern age, it’s a lot more common to find romantic relationships than platonic ones; that said, the idea of platonic relationship has been slowly coming to light in the recent decade or so forth. The idea that a love or relationship may exist within a logical structure sounds sound enough, but what we’re forgetting is that the amount of unconscious that’s being hidden from the front stage is still truly another road of mystery left for the unveiling of yet another wonderful structure of machinery. May it be romance or love without any desires, the unconscious part is what regulates and stimulates our being of forthcoming feelings and the further unexplored leave a hole for more mystic and perhaps, more phenomenal discoveries for the coming ages.

It’s probably in my best comprehension, that the love that’s formed within a romantic relationship doesn’t really come from a core being of a human. It’s executed in a way which symbolizes the Earth being engulfed in the Sun’s way since its time has come to become red giant- it’s probably not the best analogy, but try to get a good picture of what I tried to depict, it’s really just a conditional reminisce of fantasies being put forth by an unconscious desire, followed by the order of chaos. It’s quite blatant that in forming desires, we eventually form the determination for a chaos to occur in order for the order itself to come to claim its throne as it always does. Since lust is what keeps the romance alive at the core, without its presence, it becomes either platonic or pseudo-platonic (Platonic being one without many internal feelings or sexual desires in put; pseudo-platonic being the mix of both logical, internal and sexual, however with an absence of common desires.).

It may not seem like the best maze to step on, but it’s a form of suffering we must all endure in our lives, whether we like it or not. With that being stated, it’s also mandatory to keep a keen sight for the veil that’s worn by the desires themselves, for their allegory is but another obstacle for our unconscious to get through.

P.S. I oblige everyone to not take any of these words into their heads and fondle on with its strings. Take it lightly, but think it through. These are just mere words based on infinite comprehensions. 

Let's Take A Deep Breath

This isn't for the faintest of hearts or minds, this is just fantasy written within the faults of our own demise. It's the burden of our primal ancestors, it's the burden of the molecules that make us up and the burden of the stardust that molded together to gradually flourish life. It's our burden.

Our burden stands right in front of what we ought to proceed, it's like taking a ride from one end of the galaxy- wishing to kickback and enjoy,  to settling on some random planet with glamorous beauty of life, one beautiful enough to attract and invite our dopamine due to its uncommon and rare flavour. Our instincts were built so to do so, in order to keep the survival of our species. It's our burden to procreate and spread our agenda and influence all over the matrix.

This isn't just beauty, but also a sin.

For some, it may be the most beautiful of all arts that they'll ever experience; however, to some it's just not the way to go, it's just not ever about settling, it's all about exploring widely and freely without any restraint and settlement of responsibilities. It really astonished me when I was growing up, I've always held quite the opposition to settlements itself and still do. I never comprehended why people forsook their beautiful childhood behind in order to settle in for adulthood where they knew that fun would be out of the question- not to stereotype the thing in general, but that's how it seems.
As soon as the flower blooms, its objective isn't to stop blooming, it's to keep blooming until it withers away and joins back with its cosmic neighbors.

Life is fun, life is an experience, life is that one dream where we finally got to feel how it feels to be alive, yet failed to realise that there wasn't supposed to be any purpose or goals in this dream. We all made it up, because we wanted to feel like we were going somewhere trying to be satisfied. I guess we never tried to be happy even once, we don't even know what happiness is. Happiness is our constructed way of being partially satisfied, after all. It really doesn't exist at the point we delve. It only comes when we know how to love, and in order to love, we cease ourselves of our conservation of playing our norms. It'll still sound like quite the madman's imagination and since it's so even now, it's really up to us to move forward however we can. No one can force anyone to change anyone else's minds, it's really up to us, it's really dependent on how conscious we are willing to be or not. The secret teachings of all ages isn't just handed down to everyone, we got to work our way up to it, and that's when we'll realise that the secret was right next to us all our lives. Our demeanor isn't what'll dictate the future, it's our willingness to be conscious about our situation as a whole or not. 

Where I'm standing at right now, in my late teens, I'm still perplexed. I've indeed been struggling with it a lot and resisting it is not the best thing in the entire world, but it actually does serve an advantageous consequence in the long run. Albeit, I do intend to keep going this way, there might be a certain point where the primordial instinct may fire up with its maximum potential and that's the point where my radar should be clear of all opportunities, otherwise disasters might be headed towards my way. I still wish to remain the curious child I was with continuous fantasies about the life in general, that was true happiness and the major growth spurt that everyone should probably have again.

The age where we stop dreaming is the age when we turn into full-bound adults.

Adulthood is the point where we learn about our dreams, and curiosities and explore them further no matter the bounds or whatever they may be.

Why Having No Purpose Or Meaning In Life Isn't So Bad.

Again, I come forth with a very controversial topic because I, myself have been living through such a time or phase myself. Nihilism may not be appreciated or understood by everyone, but it can be categorised to be on the same edge as Zen Buddhism. Maybe not fully, but it has some correlations.

None of them require as much eloquence as they do with the mind. That's their primary focus, and that's where it all begins and concludes.

Often mistaken by Hitler's deeds, the ideologies over time has been secluded as a stereotype, passed down to the western society of scapegoats. It may just be a lesson for every person that a philosopher's sayings can't ever carry the burden of the comprehension of another perceiver, for it's up to the perceiver and their comprehension that leads their senses to a whole new road of their own ideology. Not everyone's alike, but correlatively we all are interconnected in our intellect and emotions.

From my own perspective, I think nihilism itself isn't really about to stop caring about the joy or beauty of life and the cosmos, but more so to not take anything seriously at all. That's just about it.

Don't Label.
Don't Divide. 
Don't Take Anything Seriously. 
Let It Be. 
Know That There Is No Truth. 
There's Only Our Hallucinations Of What We Sense Life To Be.
But, Just Enjoy The Ride ;) ! (Bill Hicks :D) 

(Okay, watch this TED Talk regarding Neuroscience, specifically about how our brain hallucinates.) 

It's kind of like how we just die for a while, but then we wake up from the dream we were dreaming, and now suddenly we just come to know that it was just a funny ride. A funny ride consisting of suffering, joy, agony, sorrow and all other kinds of emotions. You just start to think about the origin of your curiosity and the whole epistemological purpose behind, but then you blink your eye, look in the mirror and just wander off again being yet another person in your imagination trying to perfect out a certain scenario.
But, now you know that you don't have to be lost in that anymore, you have the freedom to let go of all the pain and curiosity itself. You don't even have to be obliged to find meaning within the observed world, because you already have found the peace you've become aware of. Thus, this transition to 'no-thingness' breaks the barrier and brings out our awareness in the wilderness.

It's funny how Soren Kierkegaard says:

"Life is not a problem to be solved, but a reality to be experienced."


Because, most of our lives we do dwell in curiosity and thought way too much, and honestly, I think that's okay, but also a bit foolish for us. On one end, we think too much and intoxicate our mind and on the other hand, we're constantly keeping a game of faith, belief and survival constructed within our lifestyle, instead of just enjoying the experience, and being engage with the play that is the dance of the cosmos. 
We're too busy learning a broad variation of newly discovered anomalies(actually, this one of the main exceptions), too busy finding a job, too busy trying to take sides within our world, too busy showing any sort of empathy, too busy to value the imagination of a moment, just too busy taking everything way too seriously, and voila! We have depression and anxiety, and now we're chasing after a cure, so that we can continue being busy again, but not thinking about the root cause of it. The biggest issue in a civilisation will always be an authority who fails to interpret, but succeeds in dictating facts that blatantly possess subjective opinion and meaning.
And Like Friedrich Nietzsche said:

"There are no facts, only interpretations." 

Good day !

P.S. I'd just like for all of you to know that all of this solely for the purpose of education and entertainment, and all the words engraved into this post are subject to interpretation, and doesn't have to stand its meaning in absolution. 

Fact Theory Part II

In my previous post , I concluded the sub-topic with the statement regarding science being almost on the same terms as religion. Whether that's completely true, or not will be articulated on in this post. 

Not to be mistaken by my statement about science, but I do have views regarding the way how science is being handled and progressed. I do, and so does several other beings on this celestial body that we've come to label a planet. My only issue with it is its idea of 'absolution'. I try my best to be skeptical and open-minded about things as much as possible. I always believe that there are more ways to explore and delve into than what we tend to know about. I believe that science itself is no exception to that sort of skepticism either. We collectively hate to be wrong at any given point, as it's our instinctual demeanor.  So, if it comes down to the debate of 'whether the truth doesn't need anyone's perception or opinions to exist or not' , then that itself would still remain a mysterious fallacy or an oxymoron that we might not be able to answer. 

This might be why:- 

1. We've not evolved to the point where we can travel the entire universe in order to look up this very 'absolution' that we've come in terms to call 'facts'. The only thing that we know about and are certain about is how they work within our realms or perceptions of existence. It'd be just as ignorant to call them 'absolute', just as to call them 'wrong'. 

2. The fact(oh , yes, there you go) that we're still fighting over our own ignorance with each other is still a red flag. We're still oblivious to how we formulate our own demeanor. An example would be of the wars we've waged for the past century or even decade. It's not a fairy tail or conspiracy theory that wars are waged solely for the economic growth and thrive, but it's more so for the cause of an imperialistic or colonialist government- which of course by definition doesn't fit the boat, but on the broader spectrum it has its eyes way beyond the belief system of the incumbent representation.

3. Even if we do evolve, the resources we'll be needing can't be extracted or refined through such means of greed or power. Such a fault must banish from existence, otherwise our technological evolution would be close to no use. This means that any sort of resource whether finite or not, must be addressed extensively to the public, instead of filling their minds with consumerist motives. This will very much offend the corporate world, because without consumerism, such a business might as well cease to exist. That's what keeps such corporations alive.

4. We as human beings should gradually learn to extinguish our pride. Now, I don't mean to hurt anyone else's feelings, but pride for things such as your own work are totally fine, as long as it doesn't enter the bounds of superiority complex or a condescending attitude. Ignorance from such pride is what's toxic to the collective well being of the human race. An example of such would be: nationalism, patriotism, religious devoted beliefs, traditional beliefs, cultural beliefs, etc.
I'm not saying that they should be completely extinguished, all I'm saying is that their practice shouldn't be forced upon anyone. The pride they contain often transforms human beings from innocent creatures to ferocious lions whose virginity has been swept away by the inferior tiger- yes, I used a dry metaphor.

5. On top of all that, what's really more important than anything else is only one such attribute that we can all master easily, but have a lot of trouble doing so. It's the best gift we have, and the only way we can ever evolve. It's our consciousness. It's being conscious of our surroundings, and of ourselves. Some call it 'open-mindedness', while some call it 'inner-peace', but whatever it may be called, it's one essential element that we'll all require regardless of whatever instruments or abilities we shed off of our evolution. Open mindedness doesn't simply come from grumbling or being disappointed, it's just learning to observe and be aware of your as well as others' situation. If everyone had such a possession, the world could probably a little bit more peaceful than usual.
Now, it's not like we won't ever attain such a thing collectively, we will, but as I've mentioned the points above, it all needs a reckoning to begin with such a process. It can't easily happen overnight, that's quite for sure. It'll oblige the mind of every single living thing on this planet, and at some later point in future, the whole universe.


Maybe, and if maybe we somehow got past those 5 points, we'd probably have a better understanding of our cause and purpose, but that's also a probability or a maybe. We never know for sure what'll work, we're just beings of flesh, electricity and thought. All we are ever sure of are how right we are in every situation. That's probably a beauty to some , but it's also a nightmare to a lot of others. That's also the reason why we've come to question this thing called 'Fact'. While, everything remains as it is, will everything still be a 'Fact Theory' , or will we someday discover how wrong or right we were ? Or maybe, how neither wrong or right we were?

That's a witty question to answer, but an answer such a question is one impossible enough to be possible to many wonderful eyes.
Science is a helpful instrument, it's one of the many younger siblings of the all-fathering instrument 'Philosophy'. One of the most powerful words that one can learn from any philosophy book are 'epistemology' and 'tautology'. Those words actually reflect much of what we discuss and talk of in a frequent basis, and what we've come to input in the past thousands upon thousands of years. It's created great significance between much of debatable fields such as science and politics. It's the reason we've come so far as intelligible beings. So, in order for anything to be correct, or wrong, may follow the path of an epistemology. Therefore, science to be wrong- in some case just like other epistemological subjects may be considered a taboo in modern society, but a few centuries from now, we'll be nothing more than probably a joke for thinking in such a tedious way.

Epistemology: Theory of knowledge. 

Tautology: Same thing said twice in different contexts or words. 

Fact Theory - Part I ( Yes, there will be Part II)

Fact Theory:

In the thriving norms of our coherent human civilization, everything is taken under the liability of subjective and objective claims and postulates. What’s being missed out is a lot more than just those 2 sides of a coin. An exploration into things such as the existentially of an observation is basic, but relative, or subject to the observer at the time or point of observation. Outside of its boundaries, the only things that remain true are the recordings of that observation. But, in any case, the observation was from one subject, and the claim regarding it remains in subject to the thoughts, motive and mindset of the observer at the time of observation. 

I decided to start reading Eckhart Tolle's book called "A New Earth Awakening", and by all means, I'm again reminded of everything that I've delved into so far. I'll admit that I try to find more of Krishnamurti ' s perspective within all things , but then again I consider everyone else's side as well without bias.

When they go back to the whole idea of not seeking anyone else's way , it just becomes a paradox as much as to our oblivious mind. An awakening doesn't come simply , it's a long process. A process that'll unwrap the mind from norms, limitations, archaic values and traditions. Some think that's really wrong and some think that's the right way. I, of course , have no control over anyone else's thoughts , ideas, mindsets or ideologies. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and that element is being slowly integrated into our society, but not so as much. It's still in a gradual process.In all seriousness , the process of going through an awakening and enabling a completely open mind can be quite complex. It can be just as hard as trying to re-learn how to walk again after one has come out of their recovery from a terrible road accident. It's mostly because the mental cognition can be quite hard to deal with when it comes in contact with alien like thoughts, or ideas. It's like trying to rewire all the nerves and their functionality. As per described by most philosophers with associations to Eastern Philosophy , stillness and silence has always been the best practice of open-mindedness. It just brings you back in place with non-existentiality and existentiality all in the same room at once- as one might profess.

The purpose is detached, the thoughts become silent waves and the meaning is nowhere. But, for once you are no longer conformed to anything at all- maybe, ironically, your consciousness. Why's it peace , though ?

It's not peace , it's just a feeling of now and eternal which is described as 'peaceful'. It's neither peaceful nor hellish. It's just nothing at all.

Opposing ideas will always come into action, of course. Mindfulness, and mindlessness. There have been cases where meditation had been deemed useless because it doesn't let you dig up on an ideology or rationalize a scenario. 

Again, whatever one does or thinks, it's just a postulate based scenario based on a being ' s observation and subjective reasoning. The whole process requires so and so , and therefore , it can continue without hindrance , unless implied to do so under condition by another being due to their attitude or mindset. One doesn't have to necessarily have to follow a pattern unless they feel satisfied by the pattern itself. Diverging may have a differing , yet equivalent result at the deeper level.

What could make it false, though ? 

Many things, in fact, there’d be ways to rationalize things based on ideological norms or perceptions of it. One could use a video camera or sound recorder to record the observation or scenario to further enhance the evidence(s) of the observation. But, is there any flaw in any of this ? There could be, but it’s not within norms , or typically accepted ideologies and methodologies. For one, the observation was made based on the perception of a human, and the recording was done as per the preceding as well. When seen or heard from a video, or sound recording , respectively, the results are still seen and heard based on the senses of a human’s perception. The question goes from ‘Why does this occur?’ To ‘Why does my mind think that it occurs this way, and not any other way? What’s the chance that my mind could be just seeing a tiny bit of what’s there?’ all the way to ‘Is this really occurring, or is this what our human minds have created as a reflection of how reality occurs?’. The questions never stop extending, it can keep going on forever and ever. However, that’s not how ‘facts’ are treated, but that’s the way it should be. Also, what most people don’t realize is that observations and recordings of observations are mostly based on emotional and subjective claims- despite the claim that ‘logic’ doesn’t come with emotions. As long as one’s a human being, it comes packaged with emotions of some form or sort. 

This is not to bash anyone else, but this is a fundamental element that must and should be addressed in any sort of scenario: the way most academic person would treat something like ‘facts’, ‘logic’ or ‘science’ can be very controversial and sometimes, it’s noticeable that they’re more concerned over political and societal norms and influences rather than exploring something without hindrances. To be more so clear, people who deeply study any sort of topic, whether it’d be ‘science’, ‘mathematics’, ‘history’, ‘English’ or ‘philosophy’ will always have concern more over their attitudes of a certain subject rather than to approach it with an open mind- some are an exception, but it’s a rarity. The conditions for an open mind are very clear, but not so easy as per the typical or archetypal human being. It may sound to the Western man like some inane sort of philosophy, but to the Eastern person, a form of peace from all sorts of worldly affairs. Stillness, meditation, non-conformity: they are what makes up the foundation of an open-minded being. Having any form of disruptive or scorny attitude otherwise eliminates ‘open-mindedness’ and that could potentially go for this statement as well- ironically. This might trigger a lot of modern day scholars, but I have my own say in any case, unless of course someone tries to take unfair actions against such a case- which would be totally inane and illogical: Religion is the base level of ignorance, it condones to nonsensical progression of closed-mindedness. Science on the other hand is but its cousin, and the condition for that is only if the scientists weren’t as ignorant. 

My First Book

Today's post is going to be unlike most of the my other posts, but summed up in a nutshell.
What do I mean by that ?

It's just a bunch of jumbles jiggling all the way in the form of water right in the jug.
Anyways, figurative languages aside, I've published my very first book on Amazon.

It might not be the best thing out there, but if you do feel as if you need some resonance with a bunch of encoded words that describe the depth of your inner meaning, or just want to look at someone else's deep contemplations, then you've probably come to the right place.

Ladies and Gentlemen- & Of course , energies around the universe.

I present to you,

My first ever book, and I've decided to call it :

Epistemological Mysticism

It's going to run as a series of books which will contain poetry and sometimes, some brief contemplations of mine. 

The link to product will be entailed onto the cover of the book below. 

Be sure to leave your thoughts, impressions and opinions on the comment section below. 

P.S. You've all my gratitude for making this possible, and of course the age itself :P. None of this would have come to existence without the experiences that have passed by. 

A Journey For Aeons

Start here, start there,
Welcome to the plain of existence,
Welcome to what we call the 'real world',
This real world,
a world of shatters and scammers,
scammers full of thoughts,
shatters full of blocks,
none of this is brought,
without the catalyst of the dawdling bird,
can this be another jack out of jill ?
or will this be just another hill of still ?
wow indeed.

stillness, that day on the hill,
we brought a will,
the will to not kill,
but to frail and jill,
jill my jill,
in a thrill,
you were bill of the nile,
a nile it sought,
within the vastness of thought,

this thought so vast,
why is it so ?
can't it be home,
on my own dome?
but it's all just lost,
within the bubbles,
representing you and I,
why is it lost ?
not to be thought.

this may be so it on the parallel,
But nothing comes out after this point of Tree   

A View Of Judgement, Identity & Ideology

In our normal day lives, we're obviously bound by cultural or traditional barriers of some sort. It may not be too much, and sometimes way too much. But, the question that should arise in one's mind is that:

"Where did this culture or ideology originate from ? What's its point of origin? "

That's blatantly not a question that one can easily answer without considering the values and peaks of all traditions , histories and cultural evolution.

Now, if one does do that, what can it benefit in the finding of the truth of reality ? 

The answer can possibly be next to nothing, or just a superfluous conclusion. 

What one doesn't really come in terms with in their daily lives is that most of all studies or knowledge will often and always be based on observational conclusions, and not really absolutions- despite claiming to be absolute.

But, what's really the issue with these traditions? 

Well, here's the answer to that: 

Practically, it refrains ourselves of our capacity to think independently, and what’s even worse is that it just mocks us of our independent and anomalous divinity: It leaves almost no room for the sufficient amount of change that we really need contrary to how essentially determined it should be.

Tradition is the one of the pillars of the foundation of a functioning human society, or any society in general.

However, why is it a recurring phenomena?

It's really because the mind seeks for some sort of response from its environment that it interacts and develops in. It's what keeps the brain chemistry of the individuals more so interactive, but it's not like the being necessarily has to, but eventually needs to.

If that's the case, then why resort to conflict ? 

It seems again and again, that many beings in general will want to gather as much attention to their ends as possible, therefore, the lesser attention they get , the more they get tempted to bring about something that'll attract the crowd that they're trying to persuade. 
It's more about to who gets more of the crowd, and attention and thus the persuasion and acts are variably based on schemes that'll either destroy or benefit. Thus, comes the birth of chaos and order, or yin & yang, according to some folks.

Max Planck once said:

So at the end of it all, it really comes down to competition and whoever has the better method of persuasion. So, you're not really working for your own cause, but just for the sake of trying to get out something to the someone else's mind, and thus evolve that into the next and so forth.
Despite the fact that he is talking in context to science, it should be noted that 'science' or 'Natural Philosophy' is only one sub-branch of a whole foundation of ideologies , branches & sub-branches. Therefore, it can be applied to anything in general.

As ideologies pass by, it gets picked up by specific minds with specific areas of interest most relatable to it, and that's where identity comes in. When we develop an ideology, we have to associate a language with it, and that's where identity and label plays a huge deal as without it we don't have a physical way of communicating it through each other- let's say for se at this point, since we haven't evolved at a point where we've been able to detect or observe within our own eyes any form of communication pattern that concerns the non-physical , and that's for the sake of the scientific community, but otherwise we have done so if  we take a look at intuition and its relationship with its surrounding occurrences.  But after we put it into the form of labels and identity, that's when we can uncover more of what we know through each other, but of course as imperfect as our minds are, not everything is within the best intention or chemistry. It doesn't take long for our minds to change its pattern of intentions, desires , wants , or thoughts in general.


Like said above, the conflicting events will always be there as it always comes down to who can get more of the attention; getting the crowd to accept their idea, or work through their own methods of persuasion. Even if it means death, conditioning, benefits to one side and losses to other side, and extinction or destruction.

That's the power of an incumbently evolving pattern of thought or ideology.

What Fallacy ?

Yes, I write such yielding ludicrous tangent, 
Whether it’s for the depth of meaning, 
Or extreme sophistry, 
The natural meaning of wisdom will only go as,
Farther decay and decay. 

Extremity suffices only the claim of the attitude of a sheep, 
In the minds of none does it produce a dopamine so sweet, 
That the ripe fruit itself explodes of sweetness and into agony. 

Make me pragmatic in your blindfold, 
Making me yield is like making a toad scream ‘roar’ ! 
Which one do you expect me to adhere to ?
 Oh, such a fallacy, you’ll never see. 

-Othello D. Gomes 

Uncursed Blessing

Is this all that I will ever get into mellow ?
Answered, mystical, yet never shallow,
I liked the beams that shot me through the eyes,
It made me feel like a star.
Rippling boundaries,
Carrying non-existent burdens,
Feels like tomorrow won’t bring me present,
It’s like the unchaining of a sparrow.
This void brings me sorrow,
But I know it eliminates narrow.

-Othello D. Gomes

".............."

Is this how you look at it ?
The form of possessing no bit,
Yet it holds the slap of grit.
A formless corruption that endorses a mole,
Has no substance but empty station.
Is this how you want to grab a hold of what's being a norm ?
A Presumption that I might not have anyone doubt,
Can successively judge its own sentimental plea.

- Othello D. Gomes

Kultic Vision

My journey is ending,
I know its phase as I’m ascending,
I descended before all of this occurred,
Having the purpose of tranquility,
Yet living in duality,
Hasn’t stopped me from reaching my potential.

Harm the peacock,
Take away its cover,
Shine it in lava,
Can you see its raw bare void now?
It’s as you know now,
The colors it reflects aren’t old or new,
It’s just your reflection that makes it skewed,
If it’s a white room,
Tell me about it,
But if it’s a black room,
I know you won’t.

What do those rooms even mean?
You can tell me about the aesthetic it has,
And the seven folded designs that it has been designed into,
However a position of duality won’t solve the anomaly.

If you’re asking me what’s it like there,
All I can tell is that:
I’ve been there a couple of times,
And I will again,
But, that’s not how you’ll know what’s it like,
I know because I’ve experienced it,
I’ve lived again to tell it,
The rest is for you to discover yourself,
However, don’t give into deception. 

-Othello D. Gomes

The Lunar Eclipse - What People Don't Realize

Something that people don't realize about the upcoming eclipse is that there are lots of linked causal effects, which aren't in the realm of astrological measurements, or maybe?

A lot has been going on recently, especially with The Super Blue Blood Moon coming up, and it's quite comprehensive that people might be going through some harsh time at this point of the phase of the moon. That's the effect that the moon poses towards us individuals who are having difficulties to try to vibrate further. Vibrations that the moon gives off is supposed to absorbed accordingly or be avoided if not absorbed to consume and grow. It can go either way but do as you may WISELY. 

That's not the weirdest part out of all of this. This isn't just a certain time of the year for subtle changes that must come to occur. It's also a point in time where there has been a number of coincidental occurrences going within maybe the multiverse or the inter-dimensions. Mandela Effect or Destruction of universes and shifting into another would be common if personally experienced at this point. 

There's no certain or strict ritual that one must perform- unless you devotedly believe in one which is quite fine to do but also fine if you don't, just keep the law of attraction and positivity on your side. One must just keep their minds and vibrations as open as possible at this point in time because there will be some changes that will be noticeable but a bit complex to reckon with. 

Well, from my own experience, or from what I've known the past few days, some of my peers have gone through a day missing links and have reported back to confirm the Mandela Effect or The Timeline Shift. I, personally had the experience to witness the destruction of several universes within the astral realm earlier today. Maybe, it does affect how we perceive our current presence. It could be why we shift into another universe when one universe is destroyed, that might as well be the time paradox. I don't know for sure, but that's a possibility that I'm not willing to slip. 

Lastly, from what I've noticed, I just want to say that I might be back to my usual vibratory state, and that's the best thing that can happen after a while of going through a lot of negativity and shifts. That could also be interpreted the Mandela Effect, but that's up to the individual to perceive and comprehend. 

P.S. If you've had something similar to what I just wrote happen to you, feel free to share on the comments :). 

Have an effulgent moment ahead ! Infinite Love <3 !

LIGHT BEINGS AND WHAT WE ARE NOT

Note: If you're reading this, please keep an open mind. Why? Because we're all infinite. 

We often talk of light beings being in the simple divinity of caricature that we simply impose in order to display an infinite light posing no ends to its velocity or its distort in the continuum. However, that's not always true, is it ? 

A word can be comprehended in infinite ways because it's not the word itself that has meaning. It's the being or vibration that vibrates or creates it, in order to give it a meaning based on its surrounding vibrations. They work together to give it a perceptive view of what it might look like to the vibratory observer who has implemented a meaning just by creating the word itself. 

Now, a word like 'light' itself can be so as well, but we must also look at its meaning as passed down from the eons. We must take a look its definition as we know it now: It can range from what gives sight to what makes one enlightened. When you take a look at the wording of 'light', you can deduct it to be 'lie it", and when you break down enlightened, it's "in lie tend".  Peculiar, right? I believe not. 

This is just getting onto somewhere. Pathways to doors are infinite, and there will always be infinite clues to infinite pathways, leading to infinite new knowledge and information. 

Note: Credits not mine. It goes to the owner itself, and if this is yours. Do comment about it, and I'll negotiate ASAP. I just used this as it's quite relevant to what I'm writing about.

We're quite unaware of how far we can get deceived into our own senses till we start realising that there's no pure path( except for your own, if you want to know the best way possible). The source itself, or infinity itself will keep sprouting its legs and strings and spindles all over existence, and will spread the duality of what we know. It's for only ignorance of ignoring of anything that'll keep us abstained from looking at an overall open-mind. To be an open-minded person, you just have to hold in information, evaluate it and still hold on to it , regardless of whether you're satisfied with its usefulness to your accommodation. One can create and conclude facts, but will never purely know one till they come to self-realization. It's for only the ignorant mind that'll ignore the most merely significant thing that it thinks of it to be. 

As long as you think it to be that, it's that inside your conscious perception. 

To ignore the darkness would be a very ignorant approach to find ourselves. We don't truly know ourselves enough to conclude what's not significant, yet it's a paradox to say we don' know ourselves and vice versa. We just have to lean on to whatever our intuition tells us to, that's one of the best approaches one can take. Don't lean on to anyone's enlightenment, as they call it. Don't lean on to anyone's way of approach. Don't lean on to their deeds or words. Just build yourself up the way your intuition tells you to, and step into the infinite loop hole of your own perceived reality. We are really all a distinct reality of our own. We're not merely universes , but a distinct reality interconnected within all vibrations and frequencies( even the interdimensions as well). Yes, that's string theory for you right there. 

Yes, I'm sort of persuading you to find the darkness within yourself, because you're trying to find what you don't see, but what you seek. What you see is the light, and what you seek is within the darkness when you close your eyes and feel the energies  & vibrations around you. It's to be, to know, to seek, not 'to see'. Light is just as good as it can be bad for seeing.- please don't miscomprehend this; ask me if you need to, but don't create a ruckus. It is when you truly find  yourself within the darkness that you escape, that you truly 'are' or 'is' , and no longer just 'know' but are  connected with the known itself. 

P.S. Before you go ahead, and start preaching a miscomprehended version of what I just said, make sure to read this again, and if you don't comprehend what it is... then GET THE FUCK OU- I'm just kidding XD. Go meditate, and find your inner self within the darkness, and let your senses be, and be unafraid of the unknown.  At the end of the road, you'll find what you've been longing for ( let there be no end to your path, though :P) 

DO YOU KNOW THE WAY ?

Do you know the way? 

What if I do know the way? it's not like it's going to benefit someone else, other than influence a certain aspect of that reflection. Within everyone's way lies the deception of just taking a piss and looking at one scene, then discussing that scene and making a complete miscomprehended concept out of it. See? People will often persuade others to follow and be on the path that they themselves have been bestowed to be upon. It's not like they're wrong or right, but it won't make much sense if someone else decides not to find themselves within, and instead follows someone else in order to depend & rely their illusion of 'safety' upon. What one doesn't realize that the 'safety' they find for can lead to a fallible deception that they wouldn't be aware of because most of the deceptive paths consist of shutting down the vibratory state and instead take an advantage of the victim's minds and control them like some lab rats. 

If you try to strive for someone else's paths instead of your own, you'd be wasting your time as you'd be deceived, and not know your 'VERY OWN PATH'. 

Don't fear loneliness, don't fear the unknown. Rather search for the unknown and find deep within that void what is truly the 'You' you don't know of yet.

Until you find and touch the void within you, it'll remain absent of the light that you're oblivious to.